DNF and mock

[Jan Zelený]

On 28. 1. 2015 at 11:52:54, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:01:44 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:09:02 +0100
> > Jan Zelený <jzeleny at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 27. 1. 2015 at 10:03:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 27 January 2015 at 01:37, Jan Zelený <jzeleny at redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ...snip...
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > Does it mean that everything either migrated to Fedora or at
> > > > > least considered
> > > > > to be migrated soon?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > When you mean everything are you asking about web servers,
> > > > database servers, email servers, etc?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Build servers
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, if we can get the ppc builders over to Fedora, then they would
> > all be running Fedora. ;)
> >
> > That doesn't mean that mock on them will be using dnf by default
> > however. That change would need to be made in koji (since it writes
> > out the mock configs). Perhaps someone would be able to submit a koji
> > patch around this?

I understand that and I will do my best to coordinate the effort here. I'm sure 
we will be able to provide some patches.

> > Also, I am not sure the status of releng tools with dnf. That would be
> > pungi (makes images), mash (makes repos), generic releng scripts (at
> > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/ ). All those may need work
> > to move to dnf. (Some more trivial than others)
> >
> > kevin
> 
> The work to port the releng tools to dnf has not yet been started.
> patches are welcome.

Actually, it has, at least to some degree. We work closely with Dan Mach and 
we already track a bunch of RFEs for hawkey. I don't know which tools are 
being worked on though, the only one I'm sure about is pungi.


Thanks
Jan