Naming packages when upstream uses dashes in the release version

[Alec Leamas]

On 06/05/15 10:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> So basically, one could end up using foo-3.80-1.1.20150506.rpm,

No. The release part (here 1.1.2015050) should not contain any part of 
the upstream release number. The same goes for foo-3.80-1_1.rpm.

I think the reasonable options are foo-3.80_1-1.rpm or foo-3.80.1-1.rpm



Cheers!

--alec