[Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.c
> om> wrote:
> > I assume that subject line got your attention.
> > 
> Most definitely. :)
> 
> So it's basically the same but without FPC as a gatekeeper?  Do you
> have any proposals for enforcement?  A periodic query of Provides
> (bundled-foo) and a BZ requesting a review?  Sometime projects
> enable unbundling over time.
> 


I don't know that enforcement is strictly necessary. Maintainers that
care will self-enforce. Maintainers that don't care won't be aided by
this.

"Enforcement" implies adding more heavy process, which is part of the
problem this is trying to avoid.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150910/4a9c4caf/attachment.sig>