dnf is completly broken

[Reindl Harald]

Am 27.09.2015 um 13:16 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 04:21:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> besides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888 and the
>
> With all due respect, there's way too much to read in there without clear
> comments that explain your thoughts.
>
> Sometimes, full output in a terminal can be self-explaining, but comments
> on what exactly you've had in mind when running commends (involving --nodeps
> and --force) could be very helpful.

uhm just "dnf update *.rpm"

>> ridicolous size of /var/cache/dnf/ in genereal it's unacceptable that
>> "dnf -v update dbmail-3.1.17-3.fc22.20150927.rh.3.1.17.x86_64.rpm
>> dbmail-manpages-3.1.17-3.fc22.20150927.rh.3.1.17.x86_64.rpm
>> dbmail-tools-3.1.17-3.fc22.20150927.rh.3.1.17.x86_64.rpm
>> gmime-2.6.20-7.fc22.20150927.rh.x86_64.rpm" *directly* in the repofolder
>> works (after repeat the command because the bug above) while DNF
>> pretends "nothing to do"
>>
>> and YES, "createrepo" was called corerctly by the script filling it for
>> many years now and a "rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/*" as well as the fact that
>> it's a own repo without mirrors leaves not much questions
>
> Show it then. Show the output of some queries to list the available
> updates for the packages you expect to be updated and the already installed
> versions.
>
> Instead, what you've shown is updating from local files.
>
> Does dnf see anything at all from your rhsoft-fedora repo?

surely

> What have you done to examine "the problem" other than claiming that
> createrepo has been run?
>
> Do you try to say that it doesn't see your local repo? Or that it fails
> to see some packages only? And yum deprecated works with exactly the same
> setup and commands?

DNF works also with the same setup and commands as far as i can see and 
then it just ignores the two packages built last night only changing 
some compiler flags and the package is always never by definition since 
it's version contains the build-date (anyways, release tag raised too)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150927/dfaf62dd/attachment-0001.sig>