I think some of the fedora mirrors haven't caught up yet. Maybe someone's waiting for them to catch up a little.<br><br>Rob Spanton<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/21/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Avi Kivity</b>
<<a href="mailto:avi@argo.co.il">avi@argo.co.il</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Jeff Spaleta wrote:
<br>> On 3/21/06, Ralph Angenendt <<a href="mailto:ralph+fedora@strg-alt-entf.org">ralph+fedora@strg-alt-entf.org</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>> I don't think so.<br>>><br>><br>> Or perhaps...the single mirror listed in the mirrorlist is acting as a
<br>> redirect at the http server level... redirecting you to some other<br>> http mirror based on http server logic which we can't easily evaluate<br>> via normal client interaction... essentially short-circuiting the
<br>> normal mirrorlist behavior we've grown used to in previous versions.<br>> I don't have a clear understanding as to expected behavior now and I<br>> need an explanation from the mirror infrastructure developers as where
<br>> things stand. Something has certaintly appeared to have changed, but<br>> without understanding the change it will be difficult to troubleshoot.<br>><br>><br>no. we have a single mirror active, and doing a 'yum upgrade' is an
<br>exercise in futility as after 4-5 headers the mirror will reject the<br>connection due to overload and yum will exit saying no more mirrors are<br>available.<br><br>the corresponding file for FC4 has all the mirrors listed, someone just
<br>needs to go and update it.<br><br>--<br>error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function<br><br>--<br>fedora-devel-list mailing list<br><a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
</a><br><a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br></blockquote></div><br>