Sweet! I thought I was going to have to recompile the whole kernel to test this out. So you're saying I can follow steps 1-5 with the drivers from CVS and then reboot and I should be running the latest hda module? Or do I also have to do step 6 as well? Thanks very much.
<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/22/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Martin Stransky</b> <<a href="mailto:stransky@redhat.com">stransky@redhat.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">The patch was merged to ALSA CVS so you may check the new alsa-driver<br>(when it comes) or download the affected file from ALSA CVS and merge it
<br>to the latest driver package.<br>how-to is here - <a href="http://people.redhat.com/stransky/alsa">http://people.redhat.com/stransky/alsa</a><br>Ma.<br><br><br>Sadda Teh wrote:<br>> Understood, I'm assuming that the changes will go into the kernel once
<br>> they release their next RC (I hope). In the meantime I'll try to compile<br>> in the patch myself and see if it actually makes a difference. BTW,<br>> great kernel compilation instructions in the release notes. Thanks to
<br>> whoever wrote those. Now, I'll go pester the folks at Alsa to get that<br>> patch upstream.<br>><br>> On 3/21/06, *Dan Williams* <<a href="mailto:dcbw@redhat.com">dcbw@redhat.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:dcbw@redhat.com">
dcbw@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br>><br>> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 13:57 -0500, Sadda Teh wrote:<br>> > Might anyone be willing to apply the patch mentioned here:<br>> > <a href="https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1895">
https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1895</a><br>> <<a href="https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1895">https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1895</a>> (You have
<br>> > to click the Guest Login link to view)<br>> ><br>> > I, and probably many others have a motherboard affected by this bug.<br>> > It would be much appreciated if the fix would make it into FC5.
<br>> > Thanks!<br>><br>> Unless patches are crashers, they likely won't make it into FC5 without<br>> being in the upstream kernel. Work with the ALSA project to make sure<br>> that patch gets into the upstream kernel ASAP, and it will show up in
<br>> Fedora quite soon after that.<br>><br>> Part of this is for quality reasons; if the patch makes it into the<br>> kernel, then it's likely it's good enough. It's also for API reasons<br>> and maintainability. The less different Fedora kernels are from
<br>> upstream "vanilla" kernels, the less work it is to update Fedora kernels<br>> every time a new upstream kernel is released.<br>><br>> Dan<br>><br>><br>> --<br>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
<br>> <a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a>><br>> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list">
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br>><br>><br><br></blockquote></div><br>