On 28/07/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Panu Matilainen</b> <<a href="mailto:pmatilai@laiskiainen.org">pmatilai@laiskiainen.org</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Michel Salim wrote:<br><br>> 1. Said packages put their documentation in %{doc}/%{name}-%{version},<br>> without %{release}<br>> 2. The RPM short-cut, triggered on package deletion, that skips the check if
<br>> a file in /usr/share/ is owned by another package<br>> 3. Yum would install the new package, *then* remove the old package<br>><br>> Filing a bug against hundreds of packages sure does not look like fun.
<br>> Suggestions?<br><br>No need to file hundreds of bugs when rpm is to blame.<br>See <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247749">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247749</a>
</blockquote><div><br>It's slightly disturbing to see the bug being marked as low-priority. Hopefully an update will be released for FC6 and RHEL 4/5 too.<br> <br></div>Regards,<br><br>-- <br>Michel<br></div>