On Dec 28, 2007 12:13 PM, Alan <<a href="mailto:alan@clueserver.org">alan@clueserver.org</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">> On 12/28/07, Alan <<a href="mailto:alan@clueserver.org">alan@clueserver.org</a>> wrote:<br>>> > On 12/26/07, subhodip biswas <<a href="mailto:subhodip@fedoraproject.org">subhodip@fedoraproject.org
</a>> wrote:<br>>> >> K3b though popular , may bear some space constraints in live cd 's .<br>>> >> But I think it can be bought back to DVD's as it was in Fedora core 6<br>>> >> and previous ... because of its popularity.
<br>>> >> --<br>>> >> Regards<br>>> >> Subhodip Biswas<br>>> >><br>>> > Please consider this for Fedora 9 Live CD:<br>>> > <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315151" target="_blank">
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315151</a><br>>><br>>> My only concern with adding K3B is all the KDE dependencies it drags<br>>> along<br>>> with it. I like the program a lot, but how much added baggage does it
<br>>> add?<br>>><br>>> I wish that the Gnome CD burning software worked as easily and as well<br>>> as<br>>> K3B, but I have yet to find one that does. (They all seem to be<br>>> horribly
<br>>> designed from a UI to me.)<br>><br></div>> What is wrong with Brasero UI? I find it very similar UI vise when<br>> comparing it to k3b, still I like k3b more because it just works<br>> better for me.
<br>><br>> Do you have some concrete UI issues with Brasero? Have you talked with<br>> some Brasero devels regarding those issues?</blockquote><div><br>I tried Brasero. It has a good UI, but rejects every blank cd I've ever used. No, I haven't said anything to the Brasero guys.
<br></div></div>-- <br>Sayonara,<br>Kamisamanou Burgess<br><a href="http://www.kamisamanou.net">http://www.kamisamanou.net</a>