<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/7/18 Bill Nottingham <<a href="mailto:notting@redhat.com">notting@redhat.com</a>>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">David Nielsen (<a href="mailto:gnomeuser@gmail.com">gnomeuser@gmail.com</a>) said:<br>
> > I'm expecting the next beta of Mono to hit the servers today. There are<br>
> > quite a few changes since 1.9.1-2, so please be aware that things may be<br>
> > broken and need rebuilding.<br>
> ><br>
> > Sorry about that. In the words of the good book "Normal service will be<br>
> > resumed just as soon as we know what normal is anyway"<br>
> ><br>
> > Also, please note that as of Mono 2.0, the licence changes to MIT rather<br>
> > that the mix and match that it currently is. This is happening right<br>
> > across the mono family as of version 2 (though probably not for the<br>
> > likes of gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp)<br>
><br>
><br>
> Rock.. are you planning to push all of this to F8/F9 once it settles down?<br>
<br>
</div></div>I can't imagine breaking the entire ABI and licensing of mono in released<br>
distros is a *good* thing. Especially Fedora 8.</blockquote><div><br>If we can manage to push it out as one big update, then I don't see how having the same mono stack, with all the fixes that has gone into Mono 2.0 would be a bad thing. <br>
</div></div><br></div>