<div dir="ltr"><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Jon Masters <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jonathan@jonmasters.org">jonathan@jonmasters.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:47 +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote:<br><br>><br>> Gah, ignore me. I meant to install i386 earlier but wound up<br>> installing<br>> an x86_64 image which accounts for the difference. And the<br>
> docs agree<br>> fully with my subsequent experience :)<br><br><br></div>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> Either way, I think you're right...the req's are kinda high...<br><br></div>Well, yes. I will do an i386 install later and compare. I don't really<br>blame the *x86_64* figures for being so high, largely because any system<br>
featuring an x86_64 probably never had less than 256MB RAM and 512MB<br>really isn't all that much to be expecting these days. It'd just be<br>nicer if we could install in a virtual machine with less allocated.<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c"><br>Jon.<br><br><br>--<br>fedora-devel-list mailing list<br><a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a><br><a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div>
<div><br>x86_64 requires more disk space/RAM because of the libraries. But it still would be nice if</div>
<div>we could come up with some idea to un-bloat various aspects in Fedora, aspects which</div>
<div>attract a somehow negative image upon the distribution.</div></div>