<div dir="ltr"><br>Hi,<br><br>Do I have to install the -debuginfo equivalent of the packages I intend to profile? Were the -release packages already compiled with -O2 -g flags so that we already have the necessary debugging information embedded into the code? Or is it just some core libraries (like pthread) that it would be nice to have their symbols in a core dump?<br>
<br>What about X? On the sysprof website, it's mentioned that it has to be recompiled from source and to avoid the generation of static modules.. Is it the case for the X server shipped with Fedora?<br><br>Regards,<br>
Ilyes Gouta.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Jerry James <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:loganjerry@gmail.com">loganjerry@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Ilyes Gouta <<a href="mailto:ilyes.gouta@gmail.com">ilyes.gouta@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">> Alright, thank you guys for the information. I'm gonna try sysprof out, it<br>
> looks like it's THE tool I'm looking for!<br>
<br>
</div>Has anyone compared sysprof with oprofile? I'm going to need a system<br>
profiler Real Soon Now, and I'm wondering how they compare to each<br>
other.<br>
--<br>
Jerry James<br>
<a href="http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/" target="_blank">http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/</a><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">fedora-devel-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>