I would argue otherwise, considering the flexibility of both vim and Emacs. Personally, I like Emacs, and I have a hard time dealing with vi and its derivatives. But, this really isn't the place to start YET ANOTHER Emacs vs. vi[m] vs. {INSERT YOUR PREFERRED EDITOR} flamewar.<div>
<br></div><div>Argue that on IRC, that's always more fun... ;)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Kevin Kofler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at">kevin.kofler@chello.at</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">Debayan Banerjee wrote:<br>
> Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs<br>
> have roughly equal user bases, chosing emacs over vim for the<br>
> distribution shows Fedora packagers' personal preference too. I guess<br>
> both vim and emacs should be available.<br>
<br>
</div>Both vim and Emacs are obsolescent and hard to use. Kate FTW!<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Kevin Kofler<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
fedora-devel-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>