<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Tim Niemueller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tim@niemueller.de">tim@niemueller.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On 01.12.2009 19:15, Braden McDaniel wrote:<br>
> Broadly speaking (beyond just Fedora), there's enough variability in the<br>
> potential names of Boost libraries that a package's configuration needs<br>
> the ability to specify a Boost library suffix. It sounds like your<br>
> package's configuration is trying to be clever and divine the required<br>
> suffix--and it's failing and falling back to no suffix.<br>
><br>
> If your package's configuration won't let you specify a suffix, the most<br>
> expedient thing to do may be just to hack it on. But an upstream-worthy<br>
> patch would add a means to specify an arbitrary suffix. Also, -mt is a<br>
> saner default than no suffix at all.<br>
<br>
</div>The suffix is determined in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake<br>
which is part of cmake, so there is nothing I can do about this in the<br>
Player package. Could this be a problem with new cmake or boost versions?<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Tim<br>
<br>
--<br>
Tim Niemueller <<a href="mailto:tim@niemueller.de">tim@niemueller.de</a>> <a href="http://www.niemueller.de" target="_blank">www.niemueller.de</a><br>
=================================================================<br>
Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)<br>
<br>
--<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">fedora-devel-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div><div>Perhaps CMake needs to be updated to 2.8.0 final? I think there was a FindBoost.cmake update in 2.8.0...</div>