<p><br>
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" <<a href="mailto:ville.skytta@iki.fi">ville.skytta@iki.fi</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647</a><br>
><br>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In<br>
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my<br>
> upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is out.<br>
><br>
> Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which<br>
> default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default<br>
> there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and base.<br>
> admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not really<br>
> an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin<br>
> activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base.<br>
><br>
> Thoughts?</p>
<p>Things like bash completion have massive performance implications on network and other slower file systems esp if its used for home directories. It certainly shouldn't be in base.</p>
<p>Peter</p>