<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 07/22/2011 01:16 PM, drago01 wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMqY-FdSRQW=nnr=79h6jqTwO4A8c1tQV1VMxz8RmrYF9-rrZA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net"><h.reindl@thelounge.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Am 22.07.2011 16:33, schrieb drago01:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Reindl Harald <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net"><h.reindl@thelounge.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Am 21.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Bryn M. Reeves:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit
did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release
including the correspondending parts of the distribution
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent threads:
System V style initialisation is _not_ 40 years old. SysV was only released in
1983 (and even after that time there were alternatives - the BSDs never adopted
this approach to system initialisation).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
so let it be 28 years now
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Still way too old ... technology has advanced a lot in the past 28 years
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
this is poor argumentation which too many peopole follow unreflected
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Its not any poorer then "it has been like that for 28 years so don't
dare to change it".
Where the sole reason for this kind of arguments seem to be "I
can't/don't want to learn anything new" ... which is really tiresome.
Working with technology like this requires change and / or learning
something new at some point. You cant just get used to one thing and
think you can stick to that for the rest of your life.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<font face="sans-serif">I don't think there would be so much push
back if it was painless to people and didn't break things.<br>
<br>
I know it is very frustrating to me when stuff that worked now all
of sudden doesn't because somebody decided<br>
that we have better, faster, newer way of doing things so lets do
it!<br>
<br>
Sound in fedora a few years ago under went this exact scenario and
it took a couple of releases for me before it became<br>
somewhat stable again. <br>
</font><br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Stephen Clark<br>
<b>NetWolves</b><br>
Sr. Software Engineer III<br>
Phone: 813-579-3200<br>
Fax: 813-882-0209<br>
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steve.clark@netwolves.com">steve.clark@netwolves.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.netwolves.com">http://www.netwolves.com</a><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>