<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
the distribution doesn't seem unreasonable/out of the ordinary in any sense.<br>
The first part where he prefers that it not be packaged at all is out of the<br>
odinary but from the conciliatory tone of the rest, perhaps its literally<br>
just him talking about his idea of an ideal world.<br>
<br>
You may package this. You may want to let upstream know that you have and<br>
that he can feel free to direct people using the Fedora packages to our<br>
bugzilla/IRC channels. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Naming wise... applications do not have to use python-* but a lot of python<br>
applications (lamson seems to be in this boat) contain python modules and<br>
those really should be named python-*. Especially nowadays when we build<br>
python3 versions of a lot of modules. From the sound of the review request<br>
("I consider Lamson analogous to frameworks[...]") this should probably be<br>
named python-lamson.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-Toshio<br>
</font><br>--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br></blockquote><br>Thanks Toshio<br>I will mail to upstream about lamson package.<br>
</div><br>Thanks and Regards,<br>Praveen Kumar<br><a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">http://fedoraproject.org/</a><br><a href="http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com</a><br> <br>