<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 09/16/2011 08:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1316218081.1871.5.camel@adam" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:48 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 09/16/2011 05:01 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:17:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">True. As far as GNOME goes, though, whenever you suggest 'bulletproof
session management', they say 'that's what suspend is for'...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I'd like to see proper session management. However, the existing
X protocol is terrible (a KDE'er talked about the horrors @ Desktop
Summit), and session management itself is really difficult.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from
the init daemon and let it do its one important job properly, robustly
and well and not suffer the path to sure death of trying to be all
things - just coz it can coz its PID 1,2, 3 etc.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
We aren't really talking about systemd any more, in this branch of the
thread.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<font face="sans-serif">Were not? From:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd</a><br>
<br>
systemd System and Session Manager<br>
<br>
</font><br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Stephen Clark<br>
<b>NetWolves</b><br>
Sr. Software Engineer III<br>
Phone: 813-579-3200<br>
Fax: 813-882-0209<br>
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steve.clark@netwolves.com">steve.clark@netwolves.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.netwolves.com">http://www.netwolves.com</a><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>