<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bkabrda@redhat.com">bkabrda@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times New Roman">Yes, Ralf says how a sentence from FHS "is meant to be interpreted". I'm giving you a clear statement, that distributions may install software into /opt. Is the interpretation that Ralf is mentioning an official interpretation of FHS authors? Because if not, you are clearly preferring your interpretations over a clear statement. Or is there something more that I don't see?\<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>Yes. I said, see the quote. Not the interpretation. If you see the quote, you can tell us how you interpret it. It might also be a useful exercise to look at how other distributions interpret it as well. What does add-on software mean? If you want to get a official interpretation, talk to whoever is supposedly trying to revise it now. <br>
<br>Rahul<br></div></div>