<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4F58DD3F.3010602@cora.nwra.com" type="cite">On
03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev
wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400,
Pavel Alexeev wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto
пишет:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33
+0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">In data domenica 26 febbraio
2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hello.
<br>
<br>
ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short
time. Soname change
<br>
happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed.
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Does it land on F17 ? , if not, why ?
<br>
</blockquote>
Do you think it have worth? I ready to do it.
<br>
</blockquote>
yes , not in koji ?
<br>
</blockquote>
Ok, that's done.
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
If you're going to push this to F17, please submit a buildroot
override and
<br>
we're going to need to rebuild everything that needs it in
F17.
<br>
</blockquote>
Do you mean I should submit ticket for that? Unfortunately I'm
not
<br>
provenpackager and have no such capability to rebuild deps. But
rуфвн вщdo
<br>
that or anything to help.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Anyone can submit a buildroot override now here:
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/new">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/new</a>
<br>
<br>
Then you should notify all relevant package owners that they need
to do a rebuild.
<br>
</blockquote>
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build
overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
update already exists. Should I delete it first and unpushing is not
enough?<br>
<br>
Pfstools update also already exists -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.8.3-7.fc17">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.8.3-7.fc17</a> . So
it does not included there. I hope its landed in repos in parallel
and that deletion is not necessary.<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<blockquote cite="mid:4F58DD3F.3010602@cora.nwra.com" type="cite">
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Would be nice to have a single update
for all if possible. I would suggest
<br>
unpushing from F17 testing until the rebuilds are done as
well.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>