<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
24.03.2012 01:30, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAA55FSNaDo-6jAsZrTd6h2WXVreW6D3tV-ozZTq=7+G_TZbT=A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
Hello.
ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change
happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed.
Does it land on F17 ? , if not, why ?
Do you think it have worth? I ready to do it.
yes , not in koji ?
Ok, that's done.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17</a>
If you're going to push this to F17, please submit a buildroot override and
we're going to need to rebuild everything that needs it in F17.
Do you mean I should submit ticket for that? Unfortunately I'm not
provenpackager and have no such capability to rebuild deps. But rуфвн вщdo
that or anything to help.
Anyone can submit a buildroot override now here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/new">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/new</a>
Then you should notify all relevant package owners that they need to do a
rebuild.
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17
gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1
ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi
what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it
first and unpushing is not enough?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
You should be able to re-push the same update that you once canceled,
after adding the other packages.</pre>
</blockquote>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
hubbitus does not have commit access to techne<br>
....<br>
<br>
I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant
its me, but it not in that moment in any case.
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
If I had them, I could compile all the packages on their own,
without asking anyone.<br>
<br>
Please could you say how I may push such update? May someone help
with it if my rights is not enough?<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAA55FSNaDo-6jAsZrTd6h2WXVreW6D3tV-ozZTq=7+G_TZbT=A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Pfstools update also already exists -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.8.3-7.fc17">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.8.3-7.fc17</a> . So it does
not included there. I hope its landed in repos in parallel and that deletion
is not necessary.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Let's hope the pfstools maintainer is aware of this issue.
Orcan
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>