Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never actually happened.<br>I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugreports.<br>
Johannes<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Michael Schwendt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mschwendt@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">mschwendt@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote:<br>
<br>
> > 21 link with flex libs <-- flex doesn't change often, though<br>
><br>
> I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all. It<br>
> exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.<br>
> Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this case.<br>
><br>
> > tilda-0.9.6-6.fc16.src older than flex-2.5.35-15.fc18.src.rpm<br>
> > 231 days<br>
<br>
Yeah, I figured so much.<br>
<br>
Interestingly, "tilda" has failed to rebuild two times in a row according<br>
to koji status, and its bug status page doesn't look too pretty:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda" target="_blank">http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda</a><br>
<br>
There's even somebody interested in co-maintaining it, but hasn't got<br>
a response in over a month: <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875</a><br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64<br>
loadavg: 0.12 0.04 0.05<br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a></font></span></blockquote></div><br>