<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 06/02/2012 05:26 PM, drago01 wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMqY-FeDoQ_wXt7ik7xMcPN+m71UJay0E=dRy2wtbdu6k=kCCA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Gregory Maxwell <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gmaxwell@gmail.com"><gmaxwell@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> I think regressing to the installs
being somewhat easier than ten yearsish ago is still a better place to
be than the cryptographic lockdown.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I disagree and once again it is not a lockdown as people who care
enough can disable it, while having it enabled by default makes things
easier for a large set of (potential) users.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Who are these potential users? How many people running windows have
you convinced to also<br>
load Linux? I have been using Linux since 0.99 and have not been
able to convince any to use Linux.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMqY-FeDoQ_wXt7ik7xMcPN+m71UJay0E=dRy2wtbdu6k=kCCA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">And if we have the choice between "make it easier to modify every part
of the OS" vs. "make it easier to instal the OS in the first place"
... no one thinking rationally would opt for the former.
Besides installation and modification aside it does provide another
additional value ... which is added security which is a welcome
addition in some environments.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Stephen Clark<br>
<b>NetWolves</b><br>
Director of Technology<br>
Phone: 813-579-3200<br>
Fax: 813-882-0209<br>
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steve.clark@netwolves.com">steve.clark@netwolves.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.netwolves.com">http://www.netwolves.com</a><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>