<div class="gmail_quote">2012/6/27 Ken Dreyer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com" target="_blank">ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I was looking briefly into packaging some Puppet modules, and I was<br>
curious if anyone else has gone down this road.<br>
[...]<br>
Does anyone have suggestions for package naming conventions? It looks<br>
like the upstream modules include the creators' names as part of the<br>
package names, which strikes me as a little verbose from the<br>
perspective of Fedora packaging.<br></blockquote><div><br>I don't think that it make much sense to pack the modules as RPMs. Under normal circumstances they must be customized in several different locations and would only produce a lot of *.rpmnew files after upgrades without proper function test possibilities. The more common way is to organize the modules in a VCS.<br>
<br>Kind regards, Thomas<br></div></div>-- <br>Linux ... enjoy the ride!<br>