On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Seth Vidal <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:skvidal@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">skvidal@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br></div>
I cannot agree enough. Just b/c we've blundered down a bad route doesn't mean you cannot turn back.<br>
<br>
Instead of chiseling our way back, let's just revert and go.<br>
<br>
Not every decision a distribution makes is a good one, lets not get caught up believing that we cannot make mistakes.<br>
<br>
UsrMove was a mistake. End of discussion. Let's go back.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>However, whether you believe this or not, UsrMove was at least an attempt to solve an actual potential problem- perceived redundancy in /bin and /lib and /usr/bin and /usr/lib.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I still don't see what problem this proposal would solve. To me it feels like a solution without a problem solely for the sake of tidiness in /.</div><div><br></div><div>Ben </div></div>