<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2012-11-07 15:47,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tim.lauridsen@gmail.com">tim.lauridsen@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD5sFAZW++-bBdBDxrZ=WrvuT2n9MQP0R4-LE2aT2FVazncCGA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Sound very strange, it is not some kind orphan
package, there have been out of Fedora and has to re-enter.
<div>It it an active maintained package in F17, there just have
not worked with latest version for gnome-shell, because they
change the way themes works in every release.</div>
<div>It a waste of reviewers time to have to review such a package
again IMHO.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Tim</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:57 PM, M.M. <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:hal8600@hotmail.it" target="_blank">hal8600@hotmail.it</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font
face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">I have requested Release
Engineering to unblock some packages, which previously had
been blocked on some branches: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5387"
target="_blank">https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5387</a></font>
<div>
<font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">I have been told
that those packages must be reviewed again in order to
be unblocked.</font></div>
<div><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">I'm not 100% sure
of what to do. Do <span style="">I have to open a new
review request on Bugzilla for each package "from
scratch" (i.e., exactly as if they were completely
new)?</span></font></div>
<div><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif"><span style="">Are
there any further steps I must take?</span></font></div>
<div><span style=""><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">Thank
you in advance.</font></span></div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><span style=""><font face="trebuchet ms,
sans-serif">M.M.</font></span></div>
</font></span><br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel"
target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
No top-posting in fedora-devel :)<br>
<br>
Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was
reviewed less than a year ago, the two others last summer. Requiring
a new review is, well, somewhat formal.<br>
<br>
That said, it should be easy to review these to resolve this issue.
If you just make some new review requests, linking to the previous
review I'll guess this could be handled without to much problems.<br>
<br>
--alec<br>
</body>
</html>