<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Panu Matilainen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmatilai@laiskiainen.org" target="_blank">pmatilai@laiskiainen.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 11/20/2012 07:45 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Panu Matilainen<br>
<<a href="mailto:pmatilai@laiskiainen.org" target="_blank">pmatilai@laiskiainen.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:pmatilai@laiskiainen.org" target="_blank">pmatilai@laiskiainen.<u></u>org</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
Now that FESCo accepted<br>
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/__Features/RPM4.11" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/<u></u>__Features/RPM4.11</a><br>
<<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.11" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/<u></u>wiki/Features/RPM4.11</a>> for F19... (in what<br>
might well be a record time - less than a minute in the meeting from<br>
proposal to acceptance :)<br>
<br>
Rpm 4.11 alpha (or actually post-alpha snapshot to pull in a few<br>
accumulated fixes + enhancements) will be hitting rawhide shortly.<br>
There's no soname bump involved this time, so no rebuilds required.<br>
<br>
There's one thing that does affect nearly every package: new<br>
warnings about bogus spec changelog dates. The most common cause is<br>
the day name not matching the given date, such as:<br>
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Tue Jun 03 2009 Panu Matilainen<br>
<<a href="mailto:pmatilai@redhat.com" target="_blank">pmatilai@redhat.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:pmatilai@redhat.com" target="_blank">pmatilai@redhat.com</a>>> - 4.7.0-5<br>
<br>
Jun 03 2009 was Wednesday, not Tuesday, hence the warning. As rpm<br>
hasn't hasn't previously validated changelog dates make sense as a<br>
whole, nearly every spec has one or more of these mistakes. It's<br>
just a warning though and doesn't cause build failures.<br>
<br>
Other than that, chances are you wont notice much anything at all.<br>
Assuming all goes well that is. So its the usual drill: keep your<br>
eyes open on rawhide builds and report any new oddities found ASAP.<br>
I'm not expecting any major issues with this but you never really know.<br>
<br>
For further details see the draft release notes at<br>
<a href="http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/__4.11.0" target="_blank">http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/_<u></u>_4.11.0</a><br>
<<a href="http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0" target="_blank">http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/<u></u>4.11.0</a>><br>
<br>
I can't build the latest wesnoth in rawhide, but I can in all older<br>
releases. Fails because some of the data is missing.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9837/4709837/build.log" target="_blank">http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.<u></u>org//work/tasks/9837/4709837/<u></u>build.log</a><br>
<br>
Is this RPM related?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I would say no: if you compare the early parts of the build.log between f19 and eg f18 build, in the successful build the translations directory and its contents gets created in a big big pile of 'mo-update' calls:<br>
<br>
-- Build files have been written to: /builddir/build/BUILD/wesnoth-<u></u>1.10.5<br>
Scanning dependencies of target mo-update<br>
[ 0%] mo-update [zh_TW]: Creating locale directory.<br>
[ 0%] mo-update [af]: Creating locale directory.<br>
[ 0%] mo-update [ang]: Creating locale directory.<br>
[ 0%] mo-update [ang@latin]: Creating locale directory.<br>
[ 0%] mo-update [ar]: Creating locale directory.<br>
[ 0%] Scanning dependencies of target wesnoth-lua<br>
<br>
...but in the f19 build, no such thing occurs:<br>
-- Build files have been written to: /builddir/build/BUILD/wesnoth-<u></u>1.10.5<br>
Scanning dependencies of target wesnoth-lua<br>
[ 0%] Scanning dependencies of target wesnoth-core<br>
[...]<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br></font></span></blockquote><div>I thought not, but wanted to be sure. It certainly f19-centric. Thanks!<br><br>And if anyone see something obvious here let me know.<br><br>-J<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
- Panu -<br>
-- <br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.<u></u>org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a></font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/</a><br>
------------------------------------------------<br>in your fear, seek only peace<br>in your fear, seek only love<br><br>-d. bowie<br>