<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se" target="_blank">bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both<br>
secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being<br>
discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's "unsupported", removing<br>
the only "supported" and secure upgrade method is definitely a<br>
regression, and quite irresponsible.<br></blockquote><div><br>I have filed a ticket for FESCo's consideration on the fedup situation<br><br><a href="https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982">https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982</a> <br>
<br>No ISO based or graphical upgrade by itself is a severe regression but having no supported upgrade path that is secure is I think is just unacceptable. <br><br>Rahul <br></div></div></div>