On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Matej Cepl <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mcepl@redhat.com" target="_blank">mcepl@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 2013-02-04, 19:52 GMT, Andrea Pescetti wrote:<br>
> It's an outdated article and not much relevant to the current<br>
> discussion (you see, it says "the Symphony repository"...).<br>
><br>
</div>> [...]<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> The Symphony code is like everything else in this respect: all<br>
> Symphony code that OpenOffice will choose to use will sooner or later<br>
> go to trunk and into a release, receiving the same paranoid attention<br>
> as the rest and a crystal clear license notice (the Apache 2 License<br>
> in this case) allowing anybody to use it.<br>
<br>
</div>And then (and only then) there will be something released from IBM to<br>
the public. Until then my comment <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/533402/" target="_blank">https://lwn.net/Articles/533402/</a><br>
stands and the discussion on that webpage is still pretty relevant.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Matěj<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>At the same time, it's still totally irrelevant for the purpose of this discussion.</div>