<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dne 14.3.2013 16:17, Kevin Fenzi
napsal(a):<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20130314091758.10c22ee5@jelerak.scrye.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:05:27 +0100
Vít Ondruch <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vondruch@redhat.com"><vondruch@redhat.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dennis, I don't blame you, but since you refer the ticket here, I can
easily quote:
> However, this also means users using branched updates-testing get
newer packages than rawhide,
> and rawhide lags behind on fixes until those updates are promoted
into updates or the base branched
> repo. Sometimes this delay is quite long during freezes.
And this exact point does not apply yet and nobody realized that. I
opened new ticket for FESCo to re-evaluate it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
That is taken a bit out of context. I was describing a problem with
the old setup. </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I know that you were describing problem of old setup and I agree
that it was there, but since we are not yet in point where Bodhi is
used, there wouldn't be the problem you were describing but we have
already the solution for non-existing problem in place.<br>
<br>
<br>
Vít<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20130314091758.10c22ee5@jelerak.scrye.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
It's simple: always do a rawhide build, then do your branched build.
kevin
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>