<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Dan Mashal <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dan.mashal@gmail.com" target="_blank">dan.mashal@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">What is a system wide change vs a self contained change vs a new change?<br></div></div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>There are two categories only: "self-contained" and "system-wide".<br></div><div><br></div><div>A rule of thumb: If _only_ the owners of the change need to be involved or informed, it is "self-contained". (This can be either because the change is so small, e.g. update of a single package, or because the number owners is so large, e.g. a SIG updating a large number of packages that are all owned by the SIG.)<br>
</div> Mirek<br></div></div></div>