<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Matej Cepl <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mcepl@redhat.com" target="_blank">mcepl@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 2013-06-03, 12:19 GMT, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:<br>
> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted<br>
> with the latest version in upstream?<br>
<br>
</div>Could you elaborate a bit on the particular situation? Why wouldn't you<br>
go with the latest upstream?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>It's always better to go with the latest version unless in an exceptional case. I just wanted to know whether it is a MUST since it is not clearly elaborated in the Package Review Guideline [1]</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>[1] <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines</a></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Matěj<br>
<span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a></font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Best Regards,<br>
<br>Kalpa Welivitigoda<br>Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society<br>Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering<br>University of Moratuwa<br>Sri Lanka<br><a href="http://about.me/callkalpa" target="_blank">http://about.me/callkalpa</a>
</div></div>