<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-06-13 11:40, Ankur Sinha wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1371116428.32626.8.camel@localhost.localdomain"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 10:29 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> - 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I can take this one.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Fine!<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1371116428.32626.8.camel@localhost.localdomain"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Would you take either anka-coder fonts[1] or lifeographer[2] in return
for this one Alec?
Both are *simple* reviews :)
[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954</a>
[2] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973868">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973868</a>
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
I think I'll go for 973868 lifeographer. Admittedly, this is the
easy path, but to be honest I'm very new to fonts and feel like a
little more experience would help before reviewing font packages...<br>
<br>
I'm busy right now, but will look into this lomorrow.<br>
<br>
Deal?!<br>
<br>
--alec<br>
</body>
</html>