<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/17/2013 02:52 PM, Colin Walters
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1371480765.3466.1.camel@localhost" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 14:34 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">refuse to use our own bug tracker ( Like the Red
Hat's Gnome developers do )
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Stop saying that, it's not true.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
What's not true that Red Hat Gnome developers having been trying to
push Fedora reporters upstream for years and that their attitude is
not well known in the QA community? <br>
<br>
Yeah sure maybe not all of you ( and reporters quickly learn who
respond to bug reports and who dont ) but here's this development
cycle remarks of it... <br>
<br>
[1] From Martin...<br>
<br>
"<br>
<pre wrap="">Please developers have a look at the following bugs (if you didn't
yet) as one of motivations for users to attend Test Days is that found
bugs will be fixed soon via updates after installation.
Note, after almost 3 months there are lot of NEW bugs in Red Hat
Bugzilla in contrast to many RESOLVED in Gnome Bugzilla. If you need
any help with triaging bugs and testing bugfixes, feel free to contact
me."<font face="sans-serif">
And Adam...</font>
</pre>
<pre>"Desktop team...I know you have this thing about not reading RH
bugs...but it really does mean you miss out on what looks like some
valuable information. Can't it be re-considered? Couldn't you at least
task someone to take a sweep through the Test Day bugs?"</pre>
<br>
Maybe you should accept the truth that is instead of accusing others
of lying here.<br>
<br>
JBG<br>
<br>
1.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2013-June/008096.html">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2013-June/008096.html</a><br>
</body>
</html>