<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Michael Scherer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:misc@zarb.org" target="_blank">misc@zarb.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 à 09:44 +0200, Johannes Lips a écrit :<br>
<div><div class="h5">><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 <<a href="mailto:drago01@gmail.com">drago01@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal<br>
> <<a href="mailto:dan.mashal@gmail.com">dan.mashal@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten<br>
> <<a href="mailto:py@luyten.fr">py@luyten.fr</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have<br>
> something like<br>
> >> "freeze tag changes until desc is better".<br>
> >><br>
> >> I propose this because testers will not _really_ want to -1<br>
> karma, and<br>
> >> as a maintainer it might be a bit hard, but with a good<br>
> reminder like<br>
> >> "not pushed to stable until desc is better" I would have<br>
> made less<br>
> >> mistakes<br>
> >><br>
> >> yes not being reminded is not an excuse and such proposal<br>
> would not save<br>
> >> time, still I believe it could help more than hurt<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > There is already a perfect example of this.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11846/selinux-policy-3.12.1-57.fc19</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> This is also a perfect example of useless "does not fix bug x"<br>
> karma.<br>
> If it is not *worse* then the previous package there is no<br>
> reason to<br>
> give it negative karma.<br>
> If it doesn't fix the bugs, the update should fix, it is appropriate<br>
> to give negative karma. Otherwise the bugs would be closed, when it<br>
> becomes stable, but won't be fixed.<br>
<br>
</div></div>That's not what the guidelines say :<br>
<br>
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines#Update_does_not_fix_a_bug_it_claims_to" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines#Update_does_not_fix_a_bug_it_claims_to</a><br>
</blockquote><div>Could be, but if the still broken bugs are going to be closed, when the update becomes stable, doesn't really help, or? Given that this is enabled in the update.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Michael Scherer<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>