<p dir="ltr">On Jul 19, 2013 2:11 PM, "Steve Clark" <<a href="mailto:sclark@netwolves.com">sclark@netwolves.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 07/19/2013 02:56 PM, "Jóhann B. Guđmundsson" wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On 07/19/2013 06:45 PM, Billy Crook wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> I haven't seen anyone asking to ship two sysloggers.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I perhaps should have been clearer and say "two logging systems" which <br>
>> we currently are doing and one of those cannot be disabled or removed so <br>
>> the logical choice is to remove the one that can and make him as an <br>
>> option to be install later.<br>
>><br>
>> JBG<br>
><br>
> This might have merit if the one you want to keep could do everything it does<br>
> plus what the one you want to remove does.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Well put. This is exactly why NoSyslog is premature. </p>