<p dir="ltr"><br>
On 29 Aug 2013 18:12, "Kevin Fenzi" <<a href="mailto:kevin@scrye.com">kevin@scrye.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300<br>
> Panu Matilainen <<a href="mailto:pmatilai@laiskiainen.org">pmatilai@laiskiainen.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> ...snip...<br>
><br>
> > Let me say AWESOME one more time :)<br>
><br>
> :)<br>
><br>
> I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you<br>
> folks. ;(<br>
><br>
> Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling<br>
> faster.<br>
><br>
> > > Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's<br>
> > > breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too.<br>
> ><br>
> > Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for<br>
> > overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some<br>
> > extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting<br>
> > scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about pushing<br>
> > potentially destabilizing updates :)<br>
><br>
> Exactly.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I know we discovered a few issues in the last couple of years doing this with arm because of using the stable fedora arm release so I'm glad we're able to help :-)</p>
<p dir="ltr">Pete</p>
<p dir="ltr">> kevin<br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
> Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a><br>
</p>