<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:28 PM, yersinia <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yersinia.spiros@gmail.com" target="_blank">yersinia.spiros@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">>5 PM, poma <<a href="mailto:pomidorabelisima@gmail.com">pomidorabelisima@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 02.01.2014 20:36, Steve Clark wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as opposed to being some<br>
>> nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only thing I am aware of that dnf means is "did not finish".<br>
><br>
> Did Not Finish<br>
> Do Not Forget<br>
> Does Not Follow<br>
> Data Not Found<br>
> Did Not Find<br>
> Does Not Function<br>
> Do Not Freeze<br>
> Do Not Fix<br>
> Do Not Fax<br>
> Do Not Forward<br>
><br>
><br>
> poma<br>
<br>
I do not think it is nice to speak so bad about a project. The<br>
objective are clear,if something can be improved everyone can or must<br>
contribute.The criticisms are useless.We are talking about open source<br>
software, do not forget.<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>On the contrary: speaking negatively about a project may be fine so long as the context is clearly about such project, as it is only the project that is being harshly criticised. Where a problem often occurs is when such criticism crosses over into affecting an individual.</div>
</div></div></div>