<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Jan 7, 2014 4:53 AM, "Frank Murphy" <<a href="mailto:frankly3d@gmail.com">frankly3d@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:59 +0100<br>
> Reindl Harald <<a href="mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net">h.reindl@thelounge.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready<br>
> ><br>
> <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310</a><br>
><br>
> It seems the majority want the current dnf default [1] to be kept<br>
> Those who want to keep "running" kernel may need to speak up [2]<br>
><br>
> [1]<br>
> <a href="http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel">http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel</a><br>
><br>
> [2]<br>
> <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">After asking on the bugzilla it seems that ales would like people who want this change to cc themselves on the bug report. If the cc reaches 40 he'll reconsider. Kinda a strange way of deciding but whatever works for the maintainer I guess.</p>
<p dir="ltr">-Toshio<br>
</p>