<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHaCVFDpNC3Yy_N6YuhB1Wbyn_2LYLER6Mr444X0+y8-Q3yQHg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>What's the point ?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHaCVFDpNC3Yy_N6YuhB1Wbyn_2LYLER6Mr444X0+y8-Q3yQHg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div> There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.<br>
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011)
and is only receiving bugfix due to existing apps who didn't
move to Gtk+3.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Oh yes, Wayland.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHaCVFDpNC3Yy_N6YuhB1Wbyn_2LYLER6Mr444X0+y8-Q3yQHg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
</div>
By migrating more apps, we can drop Gtk+ 2.24 (at least from
images), firefox is one of the major application that prevents
us to do so.<br>
<br>
</div>
H.<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Is it possible to keep current gtk 2 face as a different
plugin/frontend?<br>
<br>
-m<br>
</body>
</html>