<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Airlie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:airlied@redhat.com" target="_blank">airlied@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, "David Airlie" < <a href="mailto:airlied@redhat.com">airlied@redhat.com</a> > wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Hi all,<br>
> ><br>
> > I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm<br>
> > 3.4<br>
><br>
> Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to back<br>
> port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for llvm 3.3 in f19)?<br>
><br>
> I need clang 3.4 for my day job but have been holding off on a parallel<br>
> installable version until I know what's happening in Fedora proper.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Maybe, we might like it for GPU drivers, but I want to see how hairy it is,<br>
so far it looks rather hairy, most of the projects failed on my simple just rebuild it.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>iirc last time the rebase was required in order to get a later Mesa into the distro. I will hold off for a few days to see just how hairy things are. If you decide not to rebase f20 i will build something privately, or even a copr build if anybody else is interested in it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>If you need any help with testing, patches, etc i would be happy to help where i can.</div><div> </div></div>-- <br>There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't...
</div></div>