<div dir="ltr">Hi,<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Ville Skyttä <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ville.skytta@iki.fi" target="_blank">ville.skytta@iki.fi</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Juan Manuel Borges Caño<br>
<<a href="mailto:juanmabcmail@gmail.com">juanmabcmail@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> The packages built okay without the optional kernel module (to know,<br>
> linux-fusion is the one), if that turns to be obligatory, again, i'd take<br>
> alsa packaging as a cool example :)<br>
<br>
</div>ALSA kernel modules are included in the upstream kernel, AFAIK<br>
DirectFB ones are not. In order to be included in Fedora, they need to<br>
be upstream or Fedora kernel maintainers convinced to ship them within<br>
the kernel package.<br>
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:KernelModules" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:KernelModules</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It should be possible to build DirectFB-multi without the linux-fusion kernel module, so that's reverting to shmem and UNIX sockets for IPC. I remember I saw fixes for Fusion userspace posted against the -1.7 branch.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Ilyes</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>