<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Jan 30, 2014 3:06 AM, "Frank Murphy" <<a href="mailto:frankly3d@gmail.com">frankly3d@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:58:22 -0500<br>
> Josh Boyer <<a href="mailto:jwboyer@fedoraproject.org">jwboyer@fedoraproject.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think<br>
> > they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large<br>
> > or small it might be. I also think they can be done by the people<br>
> > wishing to provide them without relying on Fedora resources for<br>
> > hosting and creation (outside of leveraging existing packages and<br>
> > repositories).<br>
><br>
> That doesn't sound right,<br>
> logically below would also be true.<br>
> Gnome is a fairly big Spin,<br>
> and can eat up quite a lot of resources.<br>
> Maybe it should be outsourced.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I'm going to assume you mean the Desktop spin here. If the Fedora project decided to use some other DE as the default offering, then sure there could be a GNOME spin hosted elsewhere.</p>
<p dir="ltr">There's a difference between a spin and the primary thing the project ships.</p>
<p dir="ltr">josh</p>