<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 4 February 2014 11:03, Ralf Corsepius <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rc040203@freenet.de" target="_blank">rc040203@freenet.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Correct, we could - Similar things are being done at several places in Fedora.<br>
<br>
Somewhat oversimplified, the basic requirement is all shipped binaries must be built from OSI-compiliant sources-code and no closed-sources be used.</blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Well, the "tools" are totally opensource and can be built standalone, libXNVCtrl will interface with the Nvidia X.org driver; but what is the benefit of having them in Fedora if they can't be used without the proprietary blobs?<br>
Currently there's a policy that game engines cannot be shipped in Fedora if the content is not free as well; shouldn't the policy be the same (i.e. allow the engines without content or remove the tools as well)?<br>
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks,<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">--Simone<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).<br>
<br><a href="http://xkcd.com/229/" target="_blank">http://xkcd.com/229/</a><br><a href="http://negativo17.org/" target="_blank">http://negativo17.org/</a><br></div>
</div></div>