<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2014-04-11 19:19 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mzerqung@0pointer.de" target="_blank">mzerqung@0pointer.de</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Fri, 11.04.14 19:05, Miloslav Trmač (<a href="mailto:mitr@volny.cz">mitr@volny.cz</a>) wrote:<br>
<br>
> There is broad agreement that future access to the user database database<br>
> (both reading and writing) will be through sssd[1], and that the data model<br>
</div>> of /etc/{passwd,shadow} is too restrictive--we already want/need to store<br>
<div class="">> more data about users than those files allow us to. (E.g. language for<br>
> physical persons, better namespaces and more accurate password expiration<br>
> for all accounts.)<br>
<br>
</div>Uhmm, is there "broad agreement"?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, it covers sssd, realmd, accountsservice, shadow-utils, libuser; that's most major projects actually managing the data.<br></div>
</div> Mirek<br></div></div>