<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">Hello,<br>2014-04-11 13:18 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jreznik@redhat.com" target="_blank">jreznik@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>= Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =<br>
<a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6</a></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>At the FESCo meeting, we were unclear what happens to packages that don't get updated; will they sty at v5, or will they (immediately, or after a possible mass rebuild) start using v6?<br>
<br></div><div>FESCo would prefer a transition plan in which we don't risk violating licenses by omission (e.g. requiring an active maintainer's action to move a package to v6, or having somebody sign up to verify all packages in case the owners forgot).<br>
</div><div> Mirek<br></div></div></div></div>