<p dir="ltr">Hi,</p>
<p dir="ltr">That's my recollection as well. Heard that confusion about sbin being for superuser before. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Jon<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 5 May 2014 15:29, "Adam Jackson" <<a href="mailto:ajax@redhat.com">ajax@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:<br>
<br>
> however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser<br>
> binaries which should not be overriden because a binary<br>
> with the same name exists in /usr/bin<br>
<br>
My memory is that the "s" was more for "static" not "superuser".<br>
There's some conceptual overlap, static binaries being there to recover<br>
even if your shared libraries are hosed which is normally a "superuser"<br>
kind of operation, but.<br>
<br>
- ajax<br>
<br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a></blockquote></div>