<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2014-06-03 22:46 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:awilliam@redhat.com" target="_blank">awilliam@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="">On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:<br>
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote, on behalf of Matthias Clasen:<br>
> > The Software Collections repositories will be enabled by default.<br>
><br>
> So we now allow shipping the configuration for third-party repositories,<br>
> even enabled by default? Is April 1st still not over yet?<br>
><br>
> If you want those packages in Fedora, they need to get into the Fedora<br>
> repository.<br>
<br>
</div>THREAD NECRO ALERT<br>
<br>
I wouldn't put it as strongly as Kevin, but I do have some concerns<br>
about the implications here.</blockquote><div><br></div>Note that there was a lot of discussion about this (<a href="https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1297">https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1297</a> and meeting logs), resulting in “merging” this Change proposal into the main SCL one in a way that makes the original text of this proposal no longer relevant. (In particular, AFAIK the full story is that SCLs will be available through Playground, and Playground requires an explicit action to enable.)<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br>That does not <i>entirely</i> dismiss your concern, though.<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"> Mirek<br></div><br></div></div>