<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dennis@ausil.us" target="_blank">dennis@ausil.us</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do "dnf clean metadata && dnf update" purely because I found most of the time dnfs metadata was out of date. To me dnf fetching the metadata behind the scenes just doesn't work right. But I'm not sure that me or rawhide fits into the experience dnf is trying to give.<br>
<br>
Dennis</div></blockquote></div><br>Dnf-0.5.2 has a --refresh option, there will a check if the repo metadata is newer than the cached one.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">so.</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">dnf update --refresh will check and update metadata if needed.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Tim</div></div>