<div dir="ltr">Hi<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Matthew Miller <span dir="ltr"></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">See the transcript. I don't think there's any problem with coordinating it<br>
in Fedora in some way, but we don't want that to be a way that puts a burden<br>
on Fedora packagers unless they're interested. If you're interested in<br>
having a Fedora page which tracks affected upstreams, that'd be fine</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Wiki page is going to be a pain to maintain manually. How about using bugzilla to track the issues?
Using proven packager rights to fix the issues? I will also volunteer
to send any patches upstream. <br> </div><div><br></div><div>One of the issues I highlighted in the ticket which apparently wasn't discussed is <br><br></div><div><a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Default_Shell">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Default_Shell</a><br><br></div><div>It is unclear to me whether FESCo considers this guideline something that can be changed. To reiterate, the fundamental question that was placed before FESCo is whether you consider a derivative or user wanting to change /bin/sh to point to something else other than /bin/bash worth supporting or not? <br><br></div><div>Rahul<br></div><div> </div></div></div></div></div>