<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Fenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kevin@scrye.com" target="_blank">kevin@scrye.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:32:42 +0200<br>
Stanislav Ochotnicky <<a href="mailto:sochotnicky@redhat.com" target="_blank">sochotnicky@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Tue 07 Oct 2014 01:50:46 PM CEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:<br>
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:43:53PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:<br>
> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon<br>
> >> <<a href="mailto:pingou@pingoured.fr" target="_blank">pingou@pingoured.fr</a>> wrote:<br>
> >><br>
> >> Dear all,<br>
> >><br>
> >> A long desired and awaited feature for pkgdb2 is the<br>
> >> possibility to have FAS<br>
> >> groups maintain packages.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Hooray!A Thanks for this, I'm going to start testing it with<br>
> >> the robotics-sig FAS group and some of my packages.<br>
> ><br>
> > Awesome!<br>
> ><br>
> >> I put together some instructions on the requirements and<br>
> >> steps: <a href="http://pkgdb2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/groups.html" target="_blank">http://pkgdb2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/groups.html</a><br>
> >><br>
> >> I followed the above instructions to update the FAS group, but<br>
> >> I have a question about one of the requirements.A The<br>
> >> instructions say that the mailing list for the group needs to have<br>
> >> a rhbz account.A As far as I know bugzilla sends a confirmation<br>
> >> email during the account creation process.A This seems kind of<br>
> >> iffy when the email address is for a public list: should I just<br>
> >> create the account and try to be the first list subscriber to<br>
> >> click the confirmation link?A Or is there another way to create a<br>
> >> bugzilla account for SIG mailing lists?<br>
> ><br>
> > That's a good question. I guess I approached with the idea that the<br>
> > list would be new as well. So eventually, you would be the only one<br>
> > subscribed to it and thus the question is simple(r) to answer.<br>
> > But for the case of an existing list, I wonder if we can do better<br>
> > than what you describe.<br>
> > @Kevin any thoughts on this?<br>
><br>
> This is normally done by sending an email to<br>
> <a href="mailto:bugzilla-requests@redhat.com" target="_blank">bugzilla-requests@redhat.com</a> and requesting creation of "pseudo" user<br>
> with email being the mailing list. Of course there would be no real<br>
> control over this pseudo user.<br>
<br>
</div></div>I was thinking we would create a new list for each of these groups.<br>
These lists would be private (because they could contain private bugs<br>
assigned to the group). Then we could also filter on bugzilla password<br>
changes to catch those in moderation, or just let them through to the<br>
list since the list is private and only has on it trusted folks in the<br>
group.<br>
<br>
We could ask for pseudo users as well, but I've never done so, so not<br>
sure how long that takes, etc.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>I don't anticipate any issues requiring private bugs given the scope of our work, so making a new private mailing list doesn't seem too enticing. It might be easier to use the public mailing list, and just not assign watchbugzilla and watchcommits to the pkgdb group. I will bounce it off of the robotics sig list, and if we do end up asking for a pseudo user on bugzilla I'll report back with how long it took and any other issues.<br><br></div><div>Rich<br></div></div><br></div></div>